
Salish Secondary: a school where we work together to build strength and fuel passion.
Keeping our unique community in mind, we design learning for all students through our understanding that all students learn differently. We emphasize inclusive education to ensure that students with diverse learning needs, including those with disabilities, receive appropriate accommodations and support.
Our INCLUSIVE philosophy means:





Not all classrooms have four walls. - Margaret McMillan
At the foundation of our vision is a belief that students should be engaging in learning in both core and curricular competency areas. We are committed to learning that promotes strong values and helps students develop the skills to be responsible citizens.

We want all of our students to experience success, and recognize this will look different for individual students. Our Inclusive education teachers work alongside our classroom teachers to design lessons and assessments that are accessible for all students. By focussing on measuring growth we are able to identify if our strategies are supporting learning and having a positive impact on student performance.
We design learning for all students through our understanding that all students learn differently.
We support all our learners through our belief in Inclusive Education.

Tiers of support inform how Inclusive Education teachers support all learners.
Our learners receive the necessary supports to make curriculum accessible. As students gain confidence they become more engaged. This results in higher levels of academic success - teachers meet students where they are at and work alongside students as they demonstrate increasing levels of proficiency.
To understand our learners we asked how inclusive practices are impacting student performance. Specifically, we asked how designing assessments with adaptations, and implementing a teacher-student feedback loop impacted student performance on both oral and written evaluations.
Students were engaging in critical thinking tasks demonstrating their understanding of the relationship between cause and consequence when analyzing historical events. Specifically students had to:

The main adaptations to assessments were providing a word bank for students to allow them to demonstrate their understanding of concepts without having to memorize vocabulary. The other main adaptation was providing an opportunity for students to demonstrate their understanding in oral and written formats.
Adaptations can make the curriculum more accessible by:

To support all learners teachers communicate student learning clearly, and also engage in two-way feedback - giving students the opportunity to communicate how they are feeling about their learning.
Teacher's descriptive feedback:
Student feedback:
This feedback is critical to communicating clearly with parents and students in Learning Updates. Teachers provide authentic assessments and use evidence to detail students strengths, next steps, and level of engagement.

Communicating Student Learning
The Provincial Proficiency Scale guides all feedback and assessment.
Students receive descriptive feedback indicating next steps to demonstrating next level of proficiency.
In this cohort students were given the opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge, skills, and understanding in a variety of ways. One example was designing assessments with an option to communicate learning in oral or written formats. This benefitted students in a number of ways.
These strategies enabled students to thrive in communication, critical and creative thinking, and personal and social responsibility. The curriculum became more accessible, fostering an inclusive environment where all students were able to succeed and develop their critical thinking skills.
Evidence of our students’ learning demonstrates that applying adaptations, and providing two-way feedback, is positively impacting learners.
Evidence of positive impact that is detailed below includes:
The video below provides an overview of the classroom assessments and evidence of student learning.
Video Highlights
The evidence is based on 5 summative assessments administered over the length of 1 semester. Initial assessments indicated 17/54 students were at an Emerging level of proficiency. The teacher began applying strategic adaptions for students after the second assessment. After applying adaptations and integrating two-way feedback over the course of the semester the number of students at an Emerging level of proficiency fell to 2/54 students.
Assessment Results - Pink line (EMERGING level of proficiency) decreases with adaptations.
Applying adaptations to assessments is one way for classroom teachers and inclusive education specialists to provide strategic and intensive supports to meet the needs of all learners.
Students with more complex needs receive intensive supports.
Throughout the semester the teacher provided descriptive feedback to students. This feedback is specific to each student's level of proficiency, and includes clear strategies for improving academic performance. Students were also encouraged to give the teacher feedback on their learning. The teacher used this feedback to design lessons and assessments. The teachers noticed that involving students in their learning led to increased engagement, and as proficiency increased the feedback became more positive.
Students are able to select a gremlin face which reflects their level of confidence and satisfaction with the latest assessment. Teachers can use this feedback to determine where more intensive supports are needed.
Based on evidence of students’ progress in relation to our learning goals, our next steps will include:
1. Continuing to ensure all students have access to the appropriate level of support.
2. Continuing to use student feedback to design assessments that are meaningful and accessible for all.
3. Continuing to make learning accessible for all students by designing learning tasks and assessments with adaptations to create an equitable educational experience.
